I have previously reported on several shocking court cases from Sweden.

And now there is another one that I found.

In the summer of 2022, a woman in her 40s was gang raped twice by four men with Eritrean citizenship.

The first attack happened in a forest area near a train station. All four men took part in the gang rape.

Then they took the woman back to the train station where two of the men gang raped her again while another stood guard.

These were horrible attacks.

But the sentence the men got will probably shock you.

Three of the men were convicted of aggravated rape and were sentenced to only 5 years and 6 months in prison. The fourth man was convicted of rape and was sentenced to 2 years and 3 months prison.

All the men were convicted on the 30th December of 2022. But all the men are FREE today as they were eligible for early conditional release.

Let that sink in.

Here are four men that gang raped a woman and they are already back on the streets of Sweden after just a few years.

But that is not all.

All four men have citizenship from Eritrea. The prosecutor asked for deportation with a 15 year ban on returning to Sweden.

However, the court ruled that the men would NOT be deported.

The Swedish Migration Agency claimed that there was a risk the men could be subject to ”treatment similar to persecution” of they were deported back to their homeland.

Why you may ask?

Because all four men had fled Eritrea illegally in order to avoid mandatory military conscription in the country.

So, based on humanitarian grounds, Sweden did NOT deport these men and they are now set free and are walking the streets of Sweden just a few years after this horrendous attack.

This is Sweden. Not only did they not get deported, but they are released from prison after just a few years.

Not long ago, I reported on several shocking court cases that recently happened in Sweden.

One of the shocking court cases was were a man in his 40s was set FREE by the court after raping a 14 year old girl in a park.

And part of the reasoning from the court was that they claimed the girl could ”simply leave”.

This is unreal.

What is going on in Sweden?

The unreal court rulings just keep happening again and again.

Something is wrong.

Subscribe now

Christians are the most persecuted religious group in the world.

Yet you almost never hear anything about this on the news.

The world needs to know the truth and I will tell you about it.

The organization Open Doors released their World Watch List 2026, where they track severity of the persecution that Christians are facing around the world.

In case you didn’t know, this organization was founded by a man who was famous for smuggling Bibles into the Soviet Union. Already back then, the far left did not like Christianity.

So, what are the figures in the latest World Watch List? It is bad.

First of all, it is important to remember that the figures you are about to read are conservative numbers, the real numbers are likely to be much, much higher because of under reporting.

Over 388 million Christians now face high levels of persecution for their faith. This is up from 380 million in the year before.

This means that around 1 in 7 Christians worldwide face high levels of persecution for the faith.

81 countries are listed where Christians face high, very high or extreme levels of persecution.

Do you realize what this means?

This means that we are not far off from the point where almost HALF of ALL the countries on earth are places where Christians face high levels of persecution.

At some point, you have to ask yourself this question. Why isn’t this being reported all over the news?!

Furthermore, 25,794 houses, shops, businesses or other properties belonging to Christians were attacked. That is a lot.

In addition to this, another 3,632 churches and other public Christian properties were attacked in just a 1 year period.

But it doesn’t stop there. There are also a lot of Christian people who would qualify for being refugees.

A whopping 224,129 Christians were forced to leave their homes, go into hiding in their country or leave their country entirely because of persecution for being a Christian.

In Nigeria for example, large numbers of Christians have had to flee their homes because of attacks by islamists.

There is also something that is called community expulsion of converts, where Christian converts get expelled and forced out of their villages or homes by family members or village elders because of their faith.

This is reportedly common in Laos where Christians are often given ultimatums of recanting their faith or being forced to leave. Often their homes are also destroyed.

Just now in June, Open Doors reported on how Christian families were expelled in Laos because they converted to Christianity.

In one village, six families were exiled. They were given an ultimatum to recant. They refused and they all chose to remain faithful to Jesus. As a result, their homes were destroyed and they were forced out of the village.

So, over 200,000 Christians were forced to leave their homes, go into hiding or leave their country because of persecution for their faith.

These people are actual refugees. Yet we never hear anything about them in the news. That seems very weird to me. Why is the media ignoring them?

Again, it is important to remember that these figures are conservative. The real numbers are likely much higher because of under reporting.

It is clear that Christians are the most persecuted religious group in the world. Daily, Christians are having to endure hardship and persecution because they choose to follow Jesus.

Yet we never hear about it.

Even though it is increasingly happening in the West also. Just look at the UK. They have already begun arresting people for preaching.

An elderly pastor was convicted in court for preaching in the UK. All he did was holding an open air Sunday service that was considered to be in the ”wrong” place.

You may also not have heard about how Christians were severely persecuted in the Soviet Union.

In far-left ideology, atheism is the state religion. They believe that the state is their god and should be in complete control over humanity.

Now, I want to tell you about a story that has barely been reported.

This took place in the Soviet Union. Soldiers from the Red Army arrived at a church, chased out the congregation and forced them into a barn. The far-left soldiers then closed the doors and piled up flammable items against the barn door and lit it all on fire.

As the flames began burning up the building, there was the sound of the Christians inside that began singing the old hymn ”Rock of Ages, cleft for me, let me hide myself in thee”.

This is a real story that was reported in a Christian magazine from Sweden in 1932.

And I am sure that you never learned about this in school.

It is time to educate the world on the terrible persecution that Christians have suffered, not only now, but also the last 2000 years.

Subscribe now

Share

Remember how the brand new mRNA covid vaccines were pushed everywhere by the ”experts” and the mainstream media as being ”safe and effective”?

I remember.

There was a massive propaganda push everywhere about supposedly how safe these new mRNA vaccines were.

Those who dared to question this narrative were quickly branded as ”conspiracy theorists”.

In 2022, I discovered something strange. Something weird was happening with the birthrates. And it just happened to coincide with the rollout of the mRNA vaccines.

And I found some very interesting data back then that of course was completely ignored by the mainstream media.

For example, in Taiwan, there was almost a 30% drop in births from 2021 to 2022.

I also found data that showed that unvaccinated mothers in the age groups 20 to 29 in the UK had many more births than vaccinated mothers.

This of course made me wonder what on earth was going on.

Birthrates in Sweden have collapsed after 2021. In 2021, there was 114.300 babies born. In 2025 that number had dropped to only 97.491.

That means that in just a few years, the birthrates have dropped by almost 15%.

This is not normal.

Now it has been revealed that Fauci himself had privately warned about potential risk of miscarriage linked to the covid vaccines.

All the way back in 2021, Fauci was discussing covid vaccination and pregnancy with the then CDC director and a Biden covid advisor.

Fauci mentioned that people got significant cytokine storms after the 2nd dose, something that in theory could be associated with miscarriage in pregnant women.

So, in private, Fauci warned about potential miscarriage risks.

However, Fauci did not tell the public about these concerns.

We also know now that menstrual bleedings are a side effect of the covid vaccines. The European medicine agency officially listed it as such.

One study that looked at 78.138 vaccinated women, found that 39.759 of them suffered from menstrual problems after getting the covid vaccine. So over 50% of women in this particular study.

It is only natural to suspect that if women have menstrual disorders, that this could affect fertility.

Do you remember how we were told that the mRNA vaccines would stay at the injection site? That was a lie.

A study found that the mRNA itself had spread to the placenta and umbilical cord.

”Our findings suggest that the vaccine mRNA is not localized to the injection site and can spread systematically to the placenta and umbilical cord blood. The detection of the spike protein in the placental tissue indicates the bioactivity of the vaccine mRNA that reach the placenta”.

Of course, nobody in the media told you about this. But I wrote and warned about this years ago.

The establishment in unison promoted the covid mRNA vaccines to the point that anyone who dared raise questions were branded a ”conspiracy theorist”.

They told us to ”trust the science” and ”trust the experts”.

But this was actually ANTI science.

True science would have allowed people to ask questions and be skeptical.

The reason that I could write about this years ago, is because I’m not funded by people like Bill Gates.

Your continued support is very important and helps me to be able to bring you the news stories that is being censored by the media!

Subscribe now

Share

The last months have been very distressing for me.

It has come to my attention that a private investigator has been used to spy on me and my wife.

It turned out that this was on behalf of family relatives.

They have gotten the idea that my wife is “brain controlling” me with secret advanced tech. I know, it sounds, and it is, ludicrous.

I don’t know what to say even.

After months of harassment and stalking, they are now blackmailing me.

They have threatened me, saying they will publish hate articles full of lies and slander about my wife unless I agree to do certain things that they want to force me to do.

There is of course no actual blackmail, it is just made up lies and slander.

And I’m sure everyone will see right through the lies and slander.

Over the years I have received a lot of hate and attacks from the left and the mainstream media because I’m not afraid to report the truth.

I have also received hate from the actual far-right (not the imaginary far-right that the left complains about all the time).

But I never thought that the attacks could come from my own family because they suddenly have gotten an irrational hatred towards my wife.

I don’t understand this and it makes me extremely sad.

It is a massive betrayal, especially after all the things me AND my wife have done for them.

One thing is for sure.

I’m not backing down.

Never. Ever.

Please pray for my family, as what they are putting me and my wife through right now is completely out of character.

This is a very difficult situation for us.

Again, I’m never backing down.

I will never stop reporting the truth.

I have faced difficulties in the past and I have never let that stop me.

I hope you can trust that I’m not someone that will bow down under pressure.

And, if you want to help support me in this difficult time, please consider upgrading to a paid subscription if you don’t have one already.

Your support helps me to be able to continue the work that I do, bringing you the news stories that is not getting enough attention in the world.

I’m very grateful for you, my reader. Your show of support means a lot.

Subscribe now

This is big.

After the crisis in Ceuta where tens of thousands of people from Morocco stormed the borders of Europe, Italy is now leading the push to protect the borders.

It is estimated that around 72,000 people entered into European territory in Ceuta in a short period of time.

Despite what has been reported in the news that almost everybody returned, it seems like a significant number of people are still in Ceuta. Local officials in Ceuta estimate that up to 5,000 people are still there.

Spain is even planning to transfer what they say are unaccompanied minors that arrived in Ceuta over to mainland Spain as local facilities are overloaded.

The Spanish Prime Minister has told people to have ”positive solidarity”.

Italy has already temporarily suspended Schengen with Spain and begun border controls as a result of what happened in Ceuta.

”Defending the borders mean defending the security of citizens” Prime Minister Georgia Meloni said in a statement.

But it doesn’t stop there.

Italy is now leading the push for the EU to fund RETURN HUBS in third countries that is located outside the European Union.

Italy and Denmark requested an extraordinary EU meeting after the Ceuta crisis. In this meeting, Italy has advocated for the return hub proposal.

Spain however, was opposed to Italy’s return hub proposal. They think it could undermine fundamental rights and the values of the EU. They even called on Italy to lift their newly introduced border controls with Spain.

The return hubs proposed by Italy would be located in safe third countries outside of the EU and will act as a deterrent against people coming illegally into Europe.

People who have gotten a deportation order would be sent outside the European Union to one of these return hubs.

Some suggested countries where these return hubs could be located are among other Uganda, Ghana, Senegal and Tunisia.

And now Italy wants the EU to fund a network of these return hubs.

It was not long ago that the EU Parliament voted yes to approve the new Return Regulation.

So it looks like things might be changing in Europe.

Italy is now leading the push to protect the borders and want the EU to have a network of return hubs where people can be sent.

This is significant.

Protecting the borders is just commons sense.

Having open borders is extremism.

Support my independent journalism.

Upgrade to become a paid subscriber today to get access to exclusive articles.

And help fund this important work that I do.

Mainstream media has lots of funding to spread their censored news.

I need your support to be able to bring you the REAL news.

Subscribe now

Something is happening in Italy.

Italian authorities have opened a criminal investigation into the captain of a NGO ship that claimed to be rescuing people in the Mediterranean Sea.

The ship brought a large number of people from near the coast of Libya and dropped them off in Italy.

But now Italy is suspecting that they could have been coordinating together with people smugglers in order to bring people illegally into Europe.

And they have aerial surveillance video from Frontex as evidence.

The NGO vessel departed on the 6th of May this year for what they call a search and rescue mission.

On the 11th of May, the NGO vessel finds a boat carrying around 90 people, with most of them reportedly being from Bangladesh.

Wait a minute. Why are people from Bangladesh in a boat on the Mediterranean Sea near Libya to begin with?

So the NGO transfers the people onto their ship. However, here is where things become weird.

There were also five masked men aboard the boat. After the other people had been transferred onto the NGO ship, the five masked men restart the engine of their boat, reportedly give a thumbs up to the NGO crew and then they leave south back towards the African continent.

The NGO vessel found the boat around 100km north of Tripoli in Libya. But now they had to the port in Brindisi in southern Italy which is over 1000km away and took almost 4 days of sailing.

On the way to Italy, the NGO ship finds and takes onboard more people.

The ship docks in Italy with 166 people onboard, now mainly from Bangladesh, Egypt, Syria and Eritrea.

The NGO themselves claim that they were rescuing these people and that they were in distress.

But the sea was calm when the transfer of the people onto the ship took place.

Now the Italian authorities are investigating the captain of the NGO ship for ”aiding and abetting unauthorized immigration”.

It is being suspected that this wasn’t a genuine distress rescue, but that the NGO worked together with smuggling networks to bring people illegally into the country.

If eventually found guilty, the captain is facing up to 20 years prison.

When people arrive in Europe after disembarking these NGO ships, they are usually often met by other NGOs that help them further, giving them resources and advice. One such charity is Oxfam that has at least previously been operating in Italy to help the newly arrived people with everything they need. Usually they will continue their journey further north, to countries like Sweden.

The mainstream media has constantly portrayed these NGO ships as just doing rescue operations in the Mediterranean to help people who are in distress out at sea.

But it would seem now that they have actually been working together with organized networks to bring people illegally into Europe.

This should be headline news everywhere.

But of course this goes against the agenda of the mainstream media, because they support open borders.

But in so doing, it would seem they are indirectly supporting smuggling networks who exploit and put people at risk out on the sea.

Most of the media won’t report on this.

But I will.

If you appreciate the work that I do as an independent journalist, please upgrade to a paid subscriber if you haven’t already.

The mainstream media gets millions from people like Bill Gates. I don’t.

Subscribe now

A 19 year old Swedish woman has been convicted in court after warning about a man who had been convicted of committing sexual offense against a 13 year old girl.

It was true that the man was convicted. What the woman said was true. Yet this woman has now been convicted of ”gross defamation” for speaking out. And the reasoning from the court will shock you.

This 19 year old woman was a friend of the 13 year old girl and had testified against the man in court. She had even helped the girl get away from the man.

However, she encountered the man again in 2025 during a leisure activity in which this man and others were involved in.

There was a private group chat with around 20 members linked to this leisure activity. So she decided to warn the others in the group chat about this man.

The man was also in the same group chat and he reported her for defamation.

And this is what she was convicted for. She warned about a convicted sex offender that had attacked a 13 year old girl.

It didn’t matter that it was true that the man was convicted. The court decided to convict the woman of ”of gross defamation” anyway.

Now she must pay around $3100 in compensation to the convicted man.

So essentially what happened here was this. A man committed sexual crimes against a 13 year old girl, and now he is earning money because others have warned about him. This just should not be able to happen. It is a scandal.

Here is the reasoning from the court for convicting the woman.

”It is noted that the message and its information were based on an event that took place approximately three years ago. The public interest in disclosing the information cannot therefore be considered to have been of significant weight, and the District Court assesses that it was not justifiable...to disclose the information. The fact that it was true is then of no relevance to the assessment.” the court writes in the verdict.

So the court admits that what she said was true. But the court claims that there wasn’t any public interest for the woman to warn others about what he had done because the conviction took place 3 years ago. Therefore the court claims it was not ”justifiable” for her to do warn others.

Absolutely unbelievable. How does the court even come up with something like this?

But there is more. The woman was 17 years old when she warned the others in the group chat, had she been 18 years old, she would have risked being sent up to 2 years in prison instead.

Imagine that. In Sweden, people can be sent to 2 years in prison for warning others about a man that was convicted of sexual crimes against a 13 year old child.

This news comes shortly after a man in his 40s was set free by the court after raping a 14 year old girl in a Stockholm park.

In that case, part of the reasoning from the court in setting the man free, was because the court claimed that the 14 year old girl could ”simply leave”. So the court victim blamed the girl and claimed she could have stopped the attack herself.

Absolutely unbelievable.

So we have now had two court cases recently that is completely shocking. These kind of rulings just should not be able to happen.

Yet it has happened in Sweden.

A woman was convicted and sentenced for warning about a man that was convicted of sexual crimes against a 13 year old.

Meanwhile a man in his 40s who raped a 14 year old girl was set free by the court because the court claimed she could ”simply leave” during the attack.

I’m lost for words.

This is not the Sweden that I remember.

Subscribe now

Leave a comment

What I’m about to tell you has barely been covered in the international news.

The things happening in Sweden now is beyond belief. I’m simply lost for words at this court ruling.

A man in his 40s was just set FREE by the court after raping a 14 year old girl in a park.

You read that correctly. It is shocking. And the reasoning in the verdict from the court is also shocking.

Let me give you all the details.

The man who is from Romania raped the 14 year old girl in a park in Stockholm. The girl is diagnosed with both autism and ADHD.

The girl said that the attack felt ”like an eternity”.

After what happened to her, she immediately called the police crying for help. It is being reported that the girl now has difficulties sleeping after what happened to her.

The man was prosecuted in Stockholm District Court, with the prosecutor asking for 3 years prison ande deportation from Sweden for life.

But what did the court rule?

Not only did the court not deport the man, but he didn’t even get any prison. He was set free.

And here comes some shocking details from the court verdict.

”The course of events appears, in the opinion of the district court, to be such that the plaintiff had several opportunities to simply leave and/or interrupt what was happening”.

Read that again.

Part of the reasoning that the court set this man free was because they claimed the 14 year old girl could ”simply leave” when she was being raped by the man in his 40s.

So the court essentially said that this young girl could have stopped the attack herself and therefore they set the an free.

Again, I’m lost for words. This is victim blaming.

One more important thing. The girl is a child. A child cannot consent. Yet the court set the man free. This just should not be possible. This kind of verdict should not be able to happen.

Now, I need to explain a little how the Swedish court works. In this case it was a lay judge verdict.

In Sweden there is a lay judge system. So in this case, there was 1 professional judge and 3 lay judges. Lay judges are people that are nominated by political parties. This is supposed to bring public representation into the court room.

But what happened here was that the 3 lay judges decided to set the man free. And guess what? One of the lay judges is affiliated with the centre-right Moderate party that is currently in government.

The professional judge however issued a dissenting opinion and wanted the man convicted and sentence to 3 years in prison and deportation from Sweden for life.

”In my opinion, the plaintiff’s account is supported by the emergency call and the incident report...one can also hear that the plaintiff is crying” the professional judge wrote.

So the professional judge wanted to convict the man, but the 3 politically appointed lay judges decided to set the man free.

The prosecutor is not happy with the verdict and is appealing to the Svea Court of Appeal.

Subscribe now

Leave a comment

Here is something that you don’t hear much about in the news.

But right now something seems to be happening in Europe.

There has been an increasing public support for closing the borders and even deportations, something that has gained traction under the new term ”remigration”.

People have long been called ”far-right” for voicing such ideas. However, now polls show that in many European countries, there is now actually a large majority of the population that supports the idea of remigration.

Not only that, but it is now being pushed by major political parties such as the Austrian Freedom Party, which is by far the largest party in the latest polls.

I decided to take a look at the data and present it to you here.

Not long ago, I wrote about the new poll from Norway that found that there is now RECORD LOW support for more immigration into the country. Only 17% of Norwegians believe that Norway should take in more immigrants.

But not only that, the poll also found that 49% of people support voluntary returns and 35% of people support forced returns.

In total, 84% of people in Norway support remigration in some form if the situation in the home country is safe.

There was also a recent poll by Euromedia Research from Italy where they asked people their thoughts on this topic.

And it was found that 73% of Italians want to deport people who are in the country illegally.

Another recent poll from France conducted by the CSA Institute found similar numbers.

Here, they found that 83% of people in France support the idea of deporting people who have committed crime or are long term unemployed.

The most interesting thing in this poll perhaps, is that the strongest support for this was found among young people.

Among those 18 to 24 year old, a whopping 90% of people were in favor.

And this was not limited to left versus right. Support for deportation was high even among left-wing voters.

For those who support the Socialists, 75% of people were in favor of deportation.

Just recently, the EU Parliament votes to approve the new Return Regulation which gives member states the power to setup deportation centers, known as ”Return Hubs” in countries outside the EU.

So it seems like things are changing in Europe.

The idea of ”remigration” is becoming mainstream and something that many people now seemingly support.

And it is not a right or left issue. There is broad support across the political spectrum for this.

This is in stark contrast to the open borders we saw in Europe some ten years ago.

There is nothing extreme about wanting to protect your borders.

However, it is extreme to have completely open borders.

I’m bringing you the news that you don’t hear about in the mainstream media.

Support my independent journalism by upgrading to a paid subscriber today AND get access to exclusive articles!

Subscribe now

They have done it again.

The European Union have just come with more bureaucracy. It wasn’t enough with the plastic bottle caps.

Now a new law has come into effect on the 7th of July which requires all new cars in the EU to MONITOR the driver using cameras or similar sensors.

All cars must come installed with something called Advanced Driver Distraction Warning (ADDW for short).

So how exactly does this system work?

Well, all cars will come with a camera installed that constantly monitors the driver. Equivalent sensors are also allowed under this system, but it seems like cameras will be the standard.

These cameras will continuously be monitoring the eyes, face, head position and where the driver is looking.

It is designed to detect things like distraction or fatigue. This is being promoted as something that will be positive for safety.

And if the cameras deem that the driver looks away from the road for too long, for example if they spend too much time adjusting the temperature in the car.

This will then trigger warnings in the car, with lights on the dashboard and warning sounds. The cars must also give haptic feedback, such as vibrations in the steering wheel or in the seat itself.

Now, I know that many people will be concerned about having a camera inside the car that is constantly monitoring the driver.

But the cameras are not allowed to record videos, use facial recognition or send any data outside the car.

That is what is being said.

Sure, but how do we know it will stay this way?

Maybe the next step will be that facial recognition is added to the cameras. It will be very easy to implement once the hardware is in all the cars. Just a quick software update and suddenly the car can have facial recognition.

Perhaps it could be used in the future to ban anyone that the state dislikes from driving?

Perhaps a person had exceeded their carbon quota and now they are suddenly banned from driving for a month?

You never know what can happen in the future.

The more possibilities for surveillance, the easier it would be for a totalitarian system to take complete control.

Do you support freedom?

I do. The name of this publication is literally The Freedom Corner with PeterSweden.

Support my freedom publication by upgrading to a paid subscription today if you don’t have one already.

By doing so, you will be supporting my independent journalism and will allow me to do even more work to reach more people with news on freedom related topics and more.

And you get access to exclusive articles as well.

It’s a win win!

I try to keep as many of my articles as possible without a paywall, as I want as many people as possible reading about these important stories.

However, I can only do so if enough of my readers do support me with a paid subscription.

Your paid subscription is what allows me to write articles like this without a paywall!

Subscribe now

Leave a comment

The British government has announced a new draft bill called the ”Conversion Practices Bill”.

Of course, the government say that this bill is designed to protect people from ”abuse”.

But, I took a deeper look into the wording in this bill and it is quite frankly shocking.

The court can even issue a ”protection order” against a parent on a PREVENTATIVE BASIS if they think the parent is ”likely” to do something that violates this new bill. Read my article to the end to get the details on what this means.

Is this what is called pre crime?

Under this new bill, there is a serious concern that parents could be imprisoned (and more) if they for example tell their child that they are either male or female and certain criteria are met, which I will show you what they are.

Parents are risking up to 5 years in prison plus an UNLIMITED FINE if they are found to not follow this new law.

Because this new bill is broad, you just know that woke activists will use the new laws to persecute parents that refuse to follow the woke agenda.

In other words, parents that have traditional views on gender, that there is only male and female, and apply this to how they parent their children, will most certainly face risks under this new bill.

So, the bill aims to stop what they call abusive conversion practices.

What do they mean by this?

”conversion practice” means...any conduct carried out by a person towards an individual with the intention of

(a) causing the individual

(i) to have or not to have,

(ii) to believe that they have or do not have, a sexual orientation or a particular sexual orientation; or

(b) causing the individual

(i) to have or not to have,

(ii) to believe that they have or do not have, a transgender identity or a particular transgender identity.

And in another section of the bill they define transgender as also meaning that ”the individual identifies as neither male nor female or as not solely male or female”.

So the definition of transgender identity is broad and includes people who identify as non binary identities also. So, someone who identifies as ”genderfluid”, ”agender”, ”genderless” or ”bigender” would be covered by this new bill.

Keep that in mind as I go into more detail of what this bill says and how parents could be punished.

This new bill does not give exemptions to parents or family, meaning that anyone who is found in violation of this new law risk 5 years prison plus an unlimited fine. This includes parents, religious leaders and anyone else except medical professionals.

What kind of ”conduct” could cause a parent to be thrown in prison?

Let me tell you what the bill says. Let me give you a scenario.

• First: If a parent has shows conduct with the intention of either changing or preventing a belief in a particular gender identity, that qualifies as ”conversion practice” under the bill.

• Second: If a parent tells a child that they are either male or female or opposes the idea of ”genderfluid” for example and the parent use what the bill calls ”coercive words or behaviour”, then it would qualify as ”abusive conversion practice”.

• Third: If the parent has done what the bill calls ”abusive conversion practice” and it causes ”serious alarm or distress to the individual which has a substantial adverse effect on their usual day to day activities” it now crosses over into a CRIMINAL OFFENCE.

• Fourth: The parent can then be convicted in court and sentenced up to 5 years in prison plus an UNLIMITED FINE.

But it doesn’t stop there.

If anyone is found ”encouraging” a parent in ANOTHER country to tell their child that they are either male or female and it meets the criteria that I just listed above, they can also be thrown in prison for up to 5 years and unlimited fine.

For example, if someone posts it on social media, that could be enough to throw someone in prison.

But it doesn’t even stop there!

Authorities can also report or cause a ”Conversion Practice Protection Order” (CPPO) to be made against the parents if the court believes that the parents are ”likely to cause” ”serious alarm or distress to the individual which has a substantial adverse effect on their ability to carry out normal day to day activities”.

This can be done on a preventative risk basis without even what the bill calls a ”criminal offence” having been commited.

And what can this CPPO do?

Here is where things get even more Orwellian. Not only can the order be issued against a parent on a PREVENTATIVE BASIS, but the things the order can do is also very broad.

”A conversion practice protection order may contain

(a) such prohibitions, restrictions or requirements, and

(b) such other terms,

as the court considers appropriate for the purposes of the order.”

In other words, the court has a very broad discretion of what they can impose.

So for example, the court could order the parent to stop using certain words such as forcing the parent to stop telling their own child that they are either male or female.

The court could restrict or supervise contact. The court could also for example ban the parent from involving their child in religious activities that are deemed ”abusive”.

The court could possibly also order the parent to attend counselling. The list is pretty big because the court has very broad discretion.

And what happens if the parent doesn’t follow the CPPO? They can be thrown in prison for 2 years.

This is it.

Parents would risk being persecuted and thrown in prison by woke activists and authorities just because they want to raise their own children in a traditional way and they don’t agree with gender ideology.

It is clear that they think the children belong to the state rather than the parents.

And all this comes just shortly after Britain has RESTARTED trials where they will begin giving puberty blockers to children as young as 11.

I will say it loud and clear.

This goes against all human rights.

This is Orwellian.

Have you heard anything about this unbelievable story on the news?

I’m an independent journalist which is why I can bring you this story without any censorship.

But I need your help.

Please consider supporting my work with a paid subscription which will help to continue bringing you news stories like this – And I will be able to reach even more people.

Thank you for your support!

Subscribe now

Share

Just recently I reported on how the EU Parliament voted YES on the new Return Regulation.

This will enable countries to setup deportation centers, also called Return Hubs, in third countries located outside the EU.

And plans have already begun.

A group of EU countries have come together to coordinate efforts to create these return hubs with the goal of having them operational already by next year.

Denmark, Austria, Greece, Germany and the Netherlands are behind this push.

It is being mentioned that Rwanda and Uzbekistan are countries being considered where these return hubs will be built.

The government in Greece has previously said that return hubs like this will act as a deterrent to stop people from coming to Europe.

So the idea is that people arriving in Europe know there will be a chance they can be sent to a return hub far away from European borders. This in turn will act as a deterrent to stop people from coming in the first place.

And now this group of EU countries are in advanced stages of negotiations, already holding talks with host countries to build the return hubs there.

These return hubs will function essentially as deportation centers, places where people who have deportation order can be sent.

So if it is not possible to send them back to their home countries, they can be sent to these return hubs instead.

It appears that things are moving ahead quickly now.

Things are changing in Europe.

Subscribe now

Leave a comment

Today I have some updates for you from Spain that you might have missed.

A Socialist politician and the former Transport Minister of Spain was just sentenced to prison for corruption regarding covid face mask contracts.

What a surprise, there was corruption involved during the pandemic?

Not only was he the Transport Minister of Spain, but also a longtime ally of the Spanish Socialist Prime Minister, even serving as the organization secretary within the Socialist party.

So what exactly happened?

In March 2020 just as the pandemic hysteria was beginning to intensify, emergency contracts was awarded by the Ministry of Transport to a company called Soluciones de Gestión y Apoyo a Empresas. This company had no previous experience in supplying PPE.

Around 13 million masks in total were ordered with contract values of around €36.7 million.

These were ordered in to Adif, a state owned company that manages the railway infrastructure in Spain and for Puertos del Estado which manages the main commercial ports in Spain.

The former Transport Minister got kickbacks and other illicit benefits for using his position to award government contracts for face masks to this particular company.

He got €10.000 per month in cash payments to cover ”fixed expenses”.

He also got €2 million in commision from the government deals.

He also got additional benefits such as a deal on real estate in Madrid and he even got rent for an apartment paid for his partner.

The case also involved two women, one of whom was the partner of the Transport Minister, being given jobs for public state owned companies overseen by the Transport Minister as part of the scheme.

In other words, they got the job not based on merit, but because of corruption.

So essentially the Socialist Transport Minister of Spain awarded government contracts worth tens of millions to a company who paid him kickbacks and massive personal benefits.

And now he has officially been sentenced to 24 years and 3 months in prison.

However, it is being reported that he won’t actually serve more than around 16.5 years behind bars because of the laws in Spain.

Bribery and corruption from a Socialist? What a surprise.

And it happened from the government during covid? What a surprise.

Did politicians enrich themselves during the covid pandemic?

The answer is certainly yes in this case.

Become a supporter of my independent journalism.

In a world where the mainstream media continues to censor important issues, it is more important than ever that independent journalists like me are here to expose the agenda.

I need your help to do it!

Subscribe now

Very major news coming from Europe.

The European Parliament just voted YES and has now approved the new Return Regulation.

This is very big, and the left has been very upset that this law passed. But major political figures like Italian Prime Minister Georgia Meloni has supported this new regulation.

Some unusual scenes was seen in the EU parliament as the news was announced, with right-wing politicians shouting ”SEND THEM BACK” inside the parliament building.

The vote passed with 418 votes in favor of the new law and 218 voting against it.

Centre-right parties in the EU parliament came together with the right-wing parties to approve this new regulation.

So what does this mean?

This new rules establishes a Common European System for Returns with the goal of simplifying, speeding up and making returns (deportations) more effective in the EU.

Subscribe now

People who don’t cooperate, are at risk of fleeing or people who pose a security risk can be detained to ensure effective deportation of the person.

Authorities will also be able to enter the place of residence to find migrants who have failed to comply with a return order and also seize their documents and phones.

Not only that, but searches of ”other relevant premises” will also be allowed, meaning that EU citizens who are suspected of sheltering migrants with a return order can also potentially have their homes raided by authorities.

Even NGO organisations suspected of sheltering migrants with a return order can be raided.

Such raid will however require prior authorization and must be linked to enforcing specific return orders.

Return hubs.

EU member countries can now arrange agreements with third countries outside the EU to setup return hubs, places where people issued with deportation can be transferred.

This is significant.

It means there will be facilities located outside the EU where people can be deported. Essentially, they will be deportation/processing centers.

These return hubs can only be setup in countries that respect human rights and international law. In other words, it must be safe.

Of course, this will likely be a deterrent from people wanting to migrate to the EU in the first place if they know there is a risk they will be deported to a deportation centers outside the EU.

Greece already has plans to have return hubs operational by 2027. They are already in talks with several countries in Africa which could be either used as transit points or longer term facilities.

Leftist politicians are very upset at these return hubs, comparing them and the possible home raids to ”Trump era” and ”ICE style” practices.

A standardized European Return Order will also be introduced, with return decisions being shared across the Schengen area, with member states being able to recognize and enforce return decisions issued by another member state.

This won’t be mandatory at first, but may become mandatory later on.

So, big changes are happening in the EU.

One could say that this is the beginning of remigration.

Do you find my news reporting helpful and informative?

I’m an independent journalist and I rely on your support.

If you aren’t one already, please consider supporting my work with a paid subscription.

With your support, I can reach even more people with news that is being censored by the media.

Plus, with a paid subscription you will also get access to read exclusive articles.

Thank you, I couldn’t do this without your help!

Subscribe now

Something has happened.

The ”Integreringsbarometeret 2026” just dropped. This is translated as the ”integration barometer” and is research on how Norwegians look at open borders.

This new poll from Norway has found that there is now record low support for more immigration to the country.

• Only 17% of Norwegians think that Norway should take in more immigrants.

• And 49% agree that Norway ”should not let in more immigrants.”

Not only that, but this new poll found that around 50% of people believe that open border has been been bad for Norwegian ”national character” and that it has been bad for ”social cohesion in Norwegian society”.

• And 48% of Norwegians believe that integration is going ”poorly” in the country.

So it seems like the message is clear. Norwegians have now become increasingly negative to open borders.

But, there is more.

People were also asked about remigration, something that has become more and more of a hot topic in recent years.

Norwegians were asked about if Norwegian authorities should send people back to their home country if the situation there improved.

And the results may surprise you.

• 49% said they supported voluntary returns (meaning that the person agreed to return home).

• 35% said they supported forced returns.

This means that 84% of the Norwegian population support remigration in some form.

For years, this position of remigration has been framed as ”far-right” by the establishment. But do you really believe that 84% of the Norwegian population are far-right?

What is also interesting is that the liberalist/right-wing party in Norway is now doing incredibly well in the latest opinion polls.

In the latest poll by InFact the FrP party got 33.3% making them by far the largest party in Norway. The Socialist party that is leading the government only got 22.4%, lagging far behind.

The FrP party are against woke and they strongly support restricting immigration and protecting the borders.

They want zero net immigration from what they call ”high risk countries”. These are countries defined as having low respect for Norwegian values, high use of welfare benefits, high levels of extremism and more.

However, they do have exceptions for groups like persecuted Christian minorities and other vulnerable groups from ”high risk countries”.

They also want asylum processing moved to outside of Europe.

So they want to heavily restrict immigration and they are doing extremely well in the polls, which fits with the latest integration poll that shows Norwegians becoming increasingly skeptic of open borders.

I’m bringing you the news that is being hidden by the mainstream media.

And I couldn’t do it without your support.

I’m not funded by people like Bill Gates.

So I need your help to continue bringing you news stories like this.

If you aren’t already, please consider becoming a paid subscriber to help support my independent journalistic work.

Your support helps me a lot more than you know. Thank you!

For just the price of a couple of coffees per month, you can support my work AND you get access to exclusive articles that you for sure do not want to miss.

Subscribe now

Leave a comment

The Swedish Democrat party has gotten a lot of attention in Sweden the last few days.

Because they just announced that they will be campaigning for the upcoming election on banning the hijab in public in Sweden.

Not only do they want to ban full face coverings like the burqa and niqab, but they also want to go a step further and ban the hijab as well.

The hijab is the headscarf/veil.

There is an upcoming election in Sweden this year, and the Swedish Democrats announced this as part of their election campaign.

They want a total ban on the hijab and veil in public places.

In other words, this is a campaign promise from the party.

”Our position is clear. Headscarves, hijab, niqab and burqa does not belong in Sweden. Those who come to Sweden should adapt to Sweden, not the other way around. Sweden should stand up for freedom, equality and people’s right to shape their own lives.” said Sara Gille, the party spokesperson on equality and honor related issues.

”Our standpoint is that if you have these clothing items, then you can move to another country” said Sara Gille.

These statements are not coming from a small party. This is the right-wing party in Sweden and they became the second largest party in the country in the last election with around 20% of the votes.

Wait a minute.

While writing this, I just realized something. The Swedish Democrats now have a spokesperson on “honor related” issues. This is not something that we used to have before, as this was never something that existed in Sweden before. This is a new thing.

In the latest poll by SCB, the Socialist party is currently in the lead with almost 34% and the Swedish Democrat party coming in at second place with 18%.

As things stand, the left-wing coalition with the Socialists, former Communist party, Greens and the Center party would win a majority.

So as things are looking right now, the Swedish Democrats don’t look likely to get in power.

What do you think, would you support such a ban or is it an infringement on freedom of religion?

Subscribe now

Leave a comment

The right-wing government in Sweden has just made it significantly more difficult to obtain Swedish citizenship.

Beginning on the 6th of June, the Swedish National Day, it is now a completely different story for people to get citizenship.

But here is the thing. Really, these new laws sound like a basic common sense, something that should have been in place a long time ago.

So what are these new rules?

1. A new stricter rule for residency. People wishing to obtain Swedish citizenship must have lived 8 years in the country as opposed to only 5 years before. The 8 years must also have been continuous.

2. People must prove that they are able to support themselves financially. People must earn around $2200 per month to qualify. So people that are relying on benefits in Sweden will therefore generally not get citizenship anymore.

3. People must have had a ”orderly and honest life” to be allowed to get citizenship. This is to promote integration into Swedish life. If people commit crimes, there will be a delay in the possibility of getting citizenship.

4. Those seeking citizenship must now show sufficient knowledge of the Swedish language and Swedish society. So now people must be able to speak the Swedish language in order to become a citizen.

5. Children are now no longer automatically included in the parent’s citizen application. Children must have their own citizenship application.

There are a few more rules also that were changed, but these are some of the main ones.

So, people must now be able to speak Swedish to get Swedish citizenship. This sounds like obvious common sense to me. Why wasn’t this a rule before? I thought this should have been one of the first requirements to get citizenship, that you actually can speak the language of the country you are living in.

As the situation is now, many people in Stockholm don’t even speak Swedish anymore. In many Stockholm shops, English is spoken instead of Swedish.

Something very interesting has happened also. There are reports that the Swedish migration authorities have worked overtime to try and accept as many citizenship applications as possible before these new stricter rules came into effect.

Why would they do this?

Staff were required to work overtime on weekends and holidays to go through applications.

A politician from the Swedish Democrats accused the migration authorities of trying to obstruct the new stricter rules by working overtime to ”push through as many citizenship cases as possible” before the new rules applied.

Interesting.

But now at least Sweden has much stricter laws for getting citizenship.

However, if you ask me, many of these new rules are just common sense, which makes me wonder why these rules didn’t exist before?

People must be able to provide for themselves, life a honest and orderly life and be able to speak the language is just basic common sense if you ask me.

Sweden has had notoriously open borders previously, I guess the fact that we didn’t have these common sense rules before is one of the reasons.

Subscribe now

Share

UPDATE: A previous version of this article said the researchers had been arrested. However, they were not physically arrested, but are being charged.

Hold on a second here. What just happened???

This is very big, yet barely anything on the news.

A top virologist who works at the NIH has been charged with allegedly smuggling among other things monkeypox in to the USA.

And this guy doesn’t just work anywhere. He is the chief of the Virus Ecology unit at a MAXIMUM containment biolab facility in Montana.

Not only is he the chief, but he even established the unit himself.

And guess what they study?

They study how viruses can jump from animals to humans.

And now this researcher was allegedly illegally smuggling monkeypox virus into the USA.

And guess what?

This guy has been extensively studying Ebola.

Guess where he arrived from with the smuggled monkeypox virus?

The Republic of Congo, where there is now an Ebola outbreak.

”These NIH experts apparently broke our laws by smuggling viral pathogens on a packed commercial airplane from an outbreak in the Republic of Congo. Let that sink in” said U.S Attorney Jerome F. Gorgon Jr.

This shows that these top expert researchers have been extremely careless, smuggling viruses on commercial planes right under the nose of the public.

What is going on? I’m here to give you all the details that we know!

As an independent journalist, I don’t get millions in funding from big donors like Bill Gates.

With your support, I can reach even more people with news stories that is being hidden.

As much as I wish I could post all my articles and work for free, that is simply not possible as I cannot work for free (or I would starve…)

Doing investigative journalism and research takes a lot of time and hard work.

If you aren’t already, please become a paid subscriber today and you can read the rest of this article PLUS many more exclusive articles that you do not want to miss out on.

Your support is highly needed and much appreciated - Thank you so much!

Read more

It is now being reported that the United Nations is on track to run out of money by mid August as they are in an imminent financial crisis.

The UN is facing a severe liquidity crisis for their operating budget and that their available cash balance is only enough to pay for staff salaries etc. until the middle of August this year.

They have implemented energy conservation measures to try and save as much money as possible.

This means that they have been intermittently been shutting down elevators, turned down heating and air conditioning at their headquarters in Geneva and New York.

They have even turned off lights in corridors and meeting rooms. Other money saving measures include hiring freezes.

So the same organization that have been working hard to tell people that they must reduce carbon emissions, are now having to turn off their lights, heating and AC to save money as they are facing severe funding problems.

”The crisis is deepening, threatening programme delivery and risking financial collapse...I cannot overstate the urgency of the situation we now face” said UN Secretary General António Guterres already in January.

In other words, the UN is on track for a complete financial collapse. And it is imminent.

Oh, and did you know that years ago, Bill Gates donated $1.2 BILLION towards funding the UN Agenda 2030 Global Goals?

Yes, this included hundreds of millions towards global digital ID. But of course, you probably never heard about this on the news because they are protecting Bill Gates.

Why? Maybe it is because they are bought and paid for, seeing that Bill has “donated” over $319 million to various mainstream media, including the BBC.

But I did write about this and paid subscribers can read my in-depth article here.

It is really informative if you want to get a little look at what is going on behind the scenes.

But why this financial crisis?

The UN has simply not received money from major member states contributors.

A major reason here is that the Trump administration in the USA has been withholding funding to the UN to push for reforms.

The USA has around $4 billion in funding that is normally paid, however they have only paid around $160 million so far this year, leaving a massive budget deficit for the UN as the USA has been the largest funder.

And the USA is deliberately withholding money from the UN as they want to see reforms within the organization to increase efficiency, reduce bureaucracy, save money and more.

This has of already seen results with the UN coming up with massive cost cutting for their 2026 budget.

The USA has already announced their withdrawal from over 30 UN agencies, including the World Health Organization (WHO).

Why?

Because they promoted ”radical climate policies, global governance and ideological programs that conflict with US sovereignty and economic strength”.

They have withdrawn from among other the UN Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

It is clear that the UN is having a bad time, facing imminent financial collapse and are due to run out of money in just a few months.

A little note to my readers.

While the UN has been getting billions in funding over the years, including loads of money from Bill Gates…

I’m just an independent journalist that wants to bring people the news that you won’t find on the mainstream media.

Did you know that Bill Gates has donated over $319 million to the media? That means they are bought and paid for!

Of course, I don’t get the millions in funding from donors like Bill Gates that they do.

Which is why I need your help and continued support to be able to do this work.

Finding news stories that are hidden takes time and research.

If you want to help to continue bringing you new stories, please consider supporting me with a paid subscription. It helps me more than you know!

Subscribe now

Big news on the energy front coming from Italy.

Italy is now preparing to return to nuclear power after nearly 40 years without.

After the disaster at Chernobyl, Italy had a referendum in 1987 to phase out nuclear power.

This has meant that Italy has relied on renewable energy, import of gas and import of electricity.

But now the right-wing government under Georgia Meloni are working to find solutions to high energy costs (which we have seen all over Europe).

Now the government of Italy has announced that they will come with a new law to enable nuclear power to return which will be approved by this summer.

However, it is expected that this will eventually trigger a referendum in Italy where people can vote on it. It is expected that opponents will try to gather enough signatures to trigger this referendum.

And currently, the polls shows that there is around 50% support for building nuclear plants in Italy.

So with the new planned nuclear power plants, it means that Italy can produce much more electricity at home, instead of having to rely as much on imports.

The strategy is prioritizing something called small modular reactors (SMR) and advanced modular reactors (AMR).

They hope to achieve 8GWe of capacity by 2050, possibly going up to 16GWe which would cover over 20% of electricity demand.

These new generations of nuclear power plants that they want to build is not the same as those from before.

The SMR and AMR plants are both smaller and safer than previous generations of nuclear power plants.

In fact, they are dramatically safer, having around 50 to 100 times lower risk of damage to the core compared with nuclear power plants from the 1960s to 1980s.

The risk of a severe accident is estimated to be around 1 every millions to tens of million of reactor years.

Even if the very, very small chance of an accident happened, the damage would be minimal and contained to the plant site because of the design of these new reactors.

So even with the worst case scenario, models have shown that radioactive release into the environment would be minimal or even zero.

And that is for the SMR reactors which are Gen 3 reactors.

The Gen 4 reactors (AMR) actually are even safer than this. The way that they are designed makes a core melt or large release of radioactive material physically very difficult or in fact impossible.

So why have the climate fanatics been so much against nuclear power?

They have pushed very hard for removing nuclear power all across Europe. They have also demanded that fossil fuels be phased out. So what are we being left with?

We are being left with renewable energy, which is notoriously unreliable. Ironically, we have to rely on the weather being correct for produce renewable energy.

It is almost like the climate fanatics want us to not use energy or something.

Sure, renewable energy may have their place. But at the moment, if we just relied on them in Europe, we would probably run out of electricity pretty quick.

Nuclear power of course would be an excellent source of cheap energy.

A little note to my readers.

As you probably know, I’m just an independent journalist that wants to bring people the news that you won’t find on the mainstream media.

Of course, I don’t get the millions in funding from donors like Bill Gates that they do.

Which is why I need your help and continued support to be able to do this work.

Finding news stories that are hidden takes time and research.

If you want to help to continue bringing you new stories, please consider supporting me with a paid subscription. It helps more than you know!

Subscribe now

Leave a comment